Skip to content

Direct plans: keeping more of your compounding

Every mutual fund scheme in India has two versions: a regular plan and a direct plan. The underlying portfolio is identical. The fund manager is the same. The NAV movement is the same. The only difference is the expense ratio — and therefore the return that reaches you.

A direct plan has a lower expense ratio because it does not include the distributor commission that the regular plan carries. The difference is typically 0.5 to 1 percent per year. That sounds small. Compounded over fifteen to twenty years, it is anything but.

I need to be transparent here. Dhansanchay is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-171748). When clients invest through us in regular plans, we earn a commission from the AMC. When clients invest in direct plans, we do not. So I have a financial interest in regular plans — and I am telling you about direct plans anyway, because honest advice requires it.

For a family that needs no advisory support — that can select funds, manage asset allocation, rebalance, handle tax implications, and maintain discipline through market cycles entirely on their own — direct plans are the logical choice. Every basis point saved in expenses compounds over decades.

For a family that values advisory support — portfolio construction, behavioural coaching during corrections, review discipline, protection audits, nomination tracking, tax-harvesting — the regular plan commission is the cost of that support. It is not a hidden charge. It is the economic model that allows an advisory practice to exist and serve the family.

The choice is not "direct is better." The choice is "what do I need, and what is the fair cost of that need?" Some families genuinely need the advisory layer. Some do not. We would rather you make that decision with full transparency than discover the difference ten years later.

Returns will vary; discipline and documentation age better than tips. We publish these pieces so families can normalise calm, process-led thinking. Your portfolio may need something different — that is what reviews are for. Written for general education — not as individual investment, tax, or legal advice.

← Back to Insights & letters